The da vinci code author8/23/2023 ![]() ![]() If this had been a case of word-for-word copying or even paraphrasing, it seems likely that the case would have turned out very differently.Ĭourts have also offered some protection for ideas when dealing with copyright laws. Ideas fall under patent law and, thankfully, there’s no such thing as a literary patent. ![]() Copyright law by in large protects words, images and sounds, not ideas. Pedue’s works and steal the ideas, a big jump in my opinion, then the case doesn’t change very much. The case is interesting because it shows how much of a gray area plagiarism really is. He said that “A reasonable average lay observer would not conclude that The Da Vinci Code is substantially similar to Daughter of God.” He went on to say, quite correctly, that, “Ideas and general literary themes themselves are unprotectible under the copyright law.” Lewis Perdue, author of “Daughter of God” and “The Da Vinci Legacy”, claimed that Brown stole many of the ideas for the “The Da Vinci Code” from his books including the “divine feminine” and the role of Roman Emperor Constantine in converting the church to from female-dominated to male-dominated. Several news sources have reported that Dan Brown, the author of “The Da Vinci Code”, won his battle in Federal Distict Court over accused plagiarism in the book.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |